TSTP Solution File: SET635^5 by Satallax---3.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Satallax---3.5
% Problem  : SET635^5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:54:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.37s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_a,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(ty_eigen__2,type,
    eigen__2: a > $o ).

thf(ty_eigen__1,type,
    eigen__1: a > $o ).

thf(ty_eigen__0,type,
    eigen__0: a > $o ).

thf(ty_eigen__3,type,
    eigen__3: a ).

thf(sP1,plain,
    ( sP1
  <=> ( eigen__2 @ eigen__3 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).

thf(sP2,plain,
    ( sP2
  <=> ( eigen__1 @ eigen__3 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).

thf(sP3,plain,
    ( sP3
  <=> ( eigen__0 @ eigen__3 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).

thf(cBOOL_PROP_117_pme,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [X4: a] :
            ~ ( ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                 => ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) )
             => ( X3 @ X4 ) ) )
      = ( ^ [X4: a] :
            ~ ( ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                 => ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) )
             => ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                 => ~ ( X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(h0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X4: a] :
              ~ ( ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                   => ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) )
               => ( X3 @ X4 ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X4: a] :
              ~ ( ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                   => ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) )
               => ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                   => ~ ( X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cBOOL_PROP_117_pme]) ).

thf(h1,assumption,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ~ ( ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X3 )
                   => ~ ( X1 @ X3 ) )
               => ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ~ ( ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X3 )
                   => ~ ( X1 @ X3 ) )
               => ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X3 )
                   => ~ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h2,assumption,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ~ ( ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X2 )
                   => ~ ( eigen__1 @ X2 ) )
               => ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ~ ( ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X2 )
                   => ~ ( eigen__1 @ X2 ) )
               => ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X2 )
                   => ~ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h3,assumption,
    ( ^ [X1: a] :
        ~ ( ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X1 )
             => ~ ( eigen__1 @ X1 ) )
         => ( eigen__2 @ X1 ) ) )
 != ( ^ [X1: a] :
        ~ ( ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X1 )
             => ~ ( eigen__1 @ X1 ) )
         => ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X1 )
             => ~ ( eigen__2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h4,assumption,
    ~ ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ~ ( ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X1 )
                 => ~ ( eigen__1 @ X1 ) )
             => ( eigen__2 @ X1 ) ) )
        = ( ~ ( ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X1 )
                 => ~ ( eigen__1 @ X1 ) )
             => ~ ( ( eigen__0 @ X1 )
                 => ~ ( eigen__2 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h5,assumption,
    ( ~ ( ~ ( sP3
           => ~ sP2 )
       => sP1 ) )
 != ( ~ ( ~ ( sP3
           => ~ sP2 )
       => ~ ( sP3
           => ~ sP1 ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h6,assumption,
    ~ ( ~ ( sP3
         => ~ sP2 )
     => sP1 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h7,assumption,
    ~ ( ~ ( sP3
         => ~ sP2 )
     => ~ ( sP3
         => ~ sP1 ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h8,assumption,
    ( ~ ( sP3
       => ~ sP2 )
   => sP1 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h9,assumption,
    ( ~ ( sP3
       => ~ sP2 )
   => ~ ( sP3
       => ~ sP1 ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h10,assumption,
    ~ ( sP3
     => ~ sP2 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h11,assumption,
    ~ sP1,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h12,assumption,
    sP3,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h13,assumption,
    sP2,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h14,assumption,
    ( sP3
   => ~ sP2 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h15,assumption,
    ~ ( sP3
     => ~ sP1 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h16,assumption,
    ~ sP3,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h17,assumption,
    ~ sP2,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(1,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h16,h14,h12,h13,h10,h11,h6,h7,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0])],[h12,h16]) ).

thf(2,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h17,h14,h12,h13,h10,h11,h6,h7,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0])],[h13,h17]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_imp,[status(thm),assumptions([h14,h12,h13,h10,h11,h6,h7,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_imp(discharge,[h16]),tab_imp(discharge,[h17])],[h14,1,2,h16,h17]) ).

thf(h18,assumption,
    sP1,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h12,h18,h15,h12,h13,h10,h11,h6,h7,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0])],[h18,h11]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h15,h12,h13,h10,h11,h6,h7,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h12,h18])],[h15,4,h12,h18]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_imp,[status(thm),assumptions([h12,h13,h10,h11,h6,h7,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_imp(discharge,[h14]),tab_imp(discharge,[h15])],[h7,3,5,h14,h15]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h10,h11,h6,h7,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h12,h13])],[h10,6,h12,h13]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h6,h7,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h10,h11])],[h6,7,h10,h11]) ).

thf(h19,assumption,
    ( sP3
   => ~ sP1 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h16,h12,h13,h10,h19,h16,h14,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0])],[h12,h16]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h11,h12,h13,h10,h19,h16,h14,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0])],[h12,h16]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_imp,[status(thm),assumptions([h12,h13,h10,h19,h16,h14,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_imp(discharge,[h16]),tab_imp(discharge,[h11])],[h19,9,10,h16,h11]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h10,h19,h16,h14,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h12,h13])],[h10,11,h12,h13]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h16,h14,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h10,h19])],[h9,12,h10,h19]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h16,h12,h13,h10,h19,h17,h14,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0])],[h12,h16]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h11,h12,h13,h10,h19,h17,h14,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0])],[h13,h17]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_imp,[status(thm),assumptions([h12,h13,h10,h19,h17,h14,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_imp(discharge,[h16]),tab_imp(discharge,[h11])],[h19,14,15,h16,h11]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h10,h19,h17,h14,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h12,h13])],[h10,16,h12,h13]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h17,h14,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h10,h19])],[h9,17,h10,h19]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_imp,[status(thm),assumptions([h14,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_imp(discharge,[h16]),tab_imp(discharge,[h17])],[h14,13,18,h16,h17]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h16,h12,h13,h10,h19,h18,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0])],[h12,h16]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h11,h12,h13,h10,h19,h18,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0])],[h18,h11]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_imp,[status(thm),assumptions([h12,h13,h10,h19,h18,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_imp(discharge,[h16]),tab_imp(discharge,[h11])],[h19,20,21,h16,h11]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h10,h19,h18,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h12,h13])],[h10,22,h12,h13]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h18,h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h10,h19])],[h9,23,h10,h19]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_imp,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h9,h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_imp(discharge,[h14]),tab_imp(discharge,[h18])],[h8,19,24,h14,h18]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_be,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_be(discharge,[h6,h7]),tab_be(discharge,[h8,h9])],[h5,8,25,h6,h7,h8,h9]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h4,h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h5]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__3)],[h4,26,h5]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_fe,[status(thm),assumptions([h3,h2,h1,h0]),tab_fe(discharge,[h4])],[h3,27,h4]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h3]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__2)],[h2,28,h3]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h2]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__1)],[h1,29,h2]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h1]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h0,30,h1]) ).

thf(0,theorem,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X3: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [X4: a] :
            ~ ( ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                 => ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) )
             => ( X3 @ X4 ) ) )
      = ( ^ [X4: a] :
            ~ ( ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                 => ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) )
             => ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                 => ~ ( X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[31,h0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SET635^5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.13  % Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 04:58:23 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.37  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.37  % Mode: mode213
% 0.21/0.37  % Inferences: 0
% 0.21/0.37  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------